Very nice. Drones are fun :). yet I think you’re right (except, of course, I am pleased rather than irked).

I sometimes spend time in ambient chat boards/rooms. In an era not that far removed from our own era, a great deal of purism could infect any discussion, as anything containing “beats”, “conventional western song structure”, or even software synthesizers could be labeled non-ambient, or, worse, “new age”.

I used to love to read these kind of discussions, for all their awful glory, because they had that feeling of a literary conference in Reading among polytechnic professors debating the writings of Mrs. Gaskill’s unknown elder sister.

Some of the artists imagined they were doing something as difficult as Chopin, and as rare as a double-image stamp. Then, of course, it turned out that the technology could and did generate tons of easy ways to create these sounds—and new artists who preferred to play music and not debate so much—which, surprisingly, garnered them actual listeners and even sales.
The emperor had clothing, but it turned out anyone could stitch new threads.

Yet I find myself wide-eyed about electronica music and its ambient by-path in just the same way that I am impressed that a teen can take a nylon-strings guitar and learn to play folk songs by herself, or with the help of a youtube. In my mind, it’s this thrill, rather than the thrill of whether something is “pure” ambient that interests me.
The netlabel music, of course, proves that the masses can play ambient music with that best of nylon-stringed guitars, the software synthesizer. To me, it is nothing more nor less than simple folk music-the mountain dulcimer made virtual.

Personally, I’ve never seen any argument about music that tastes as good as a diet sasparilla.

My difficult debates are all internal—like which Nigel North lute song I am going to buy when I have chosen to buy but one.

One thing that’s important to me is to have backing that’s a proper furnishing music for an empty sonic space. Thanks for putting this one in, as it seems just right for a place and time.

Drones are fun.

I can relate to your cynicism. I’ve done this piece (or same as) and had the same thought. How much value can it have if anyone can do it and with such little effort. But I think for this application this piece works. Also I like the fact that at least the ingredients were morphed, not just arranged.

I too ask my self that question over and over again. last time I did so was this very morning when I was about to fry our breakfast eggs. what’s the optimal today? …well, it turned out that my today’s optimal (with onions, tomatoes and sardines) wasn’t very appreciated by all who shared the table. Guess I have to keep going on with my search for the optimal… where is it… somebody… anybody?
Now to something completely different: Drones are fun.

Do molecules feel…..?
Feelings imply consciousness…
is the question rather…
“does everything (all that is) possess consciousness?”

My technical skills extend to replacing broken light bulbs in our car. But I do that pretty darn well.

Excellent. Sounds like an orchestration of sub atomic particles. Protons, Neutrons and Electrons in solid harmony.

Intense.

i am mesmerized by this mix. do molecules feel? do they have memory? is there an aspect of each of us, that remains connected to our molecules after we leave cellular matter?

these are the thoughts i had while listening……..we start as a white cube……..

genius work Loveshadow - we can’t underestimate simplicity!

nice sounds
i used this on http://www.nefkom.info/ws/i...
as background

thx & respect from me to your work