Early Birds Begin Nesting in the Tree
skip

Reviews for "two letters"

two letters
by sHORT fACED bEAR
Recommends (12)
Fri, Dec 31, 2004 @ 9:00 PM

Uses samples from:

Samples are used in:

 
fourstones
.
permalink   Sat, Jan 1, 2005 @ 11:26 AM
This is a really, really neat idea. Some (unsolicited) suggestions:

- Encode it at 128bps (instead of 320)
- Make it 6mins long ;)
- It sounds almost mono, spread things out
- I’m guessing you meant to tag it ‘drums and bass’ not ‘dum and bass’

I would really love to hear the extended version.
 
.
permalink   sHORT fACED bEAR Sat, Jan 1, 2005 @ 11:46 AM
Quote: This is a really, really neat idea. Some (unsolicited) suggestions:

- Encode it at 128bps (instead of 320)
- Make it 6mins long ;)
- It sounds almost mono, spread things out
- I’m guessing you meant to tag it ‘drums and bass’ not ‘dum and bass’

I would really love to hear the extended version.


thanks for the sugestions man… i kinda uploaded it a bit prematurely i think, listening to it today i wasnt to happy with it to be honest, so, extended version comming soon..
Future Boy
.
permalink   Sun, Jan 2, 2005 @ 12:36 PM
Quote: Great work beaRface!

[QUOTE BY= victor] …Some (unsolicited) suggestions:

- Encode it at 128bps (instead of 320)


Ermmm. I really can’t understand why- surely the higher bitrate the better?


That depends on how good your speakers/headphones are, how good your hearing is, what the actual audio content is, and so forth. I usually don’t encode anything higher than 192 and usually can’t tell the difference between that and the uncompressed playback in Sonar. Putting stuff on the internet that’s encoded at 320 is just a waste of bandwidth, IMO.
 
.
permalink   Future Boy Sun, Jan 2, 2005 @ 12:39 PM
also, I agree, this is a very cool idea. I didn’t find the mix to sound terribly mono, there were bits and pieces out to the sides, which was enough for me.
 
.
permalink   fourstones Sun, Jan 2, 2005 @ 2:53 PM
Quote: usually can’t tell the difference between that and the uncompressed playback in Sonar. Putting stuff on the internet that’s encoded at 320 is just a waste of bandwidth, IMO.

yup, listerers can’t tell the difference in sound quality but they don’t like it when a stream breaks up. Plus m not sure he could even fit a 5/6 min jam under the 10mg limit of uploads here.
Caleb Charles
.
permalink   Thu, Jan 6, 2005 @ 8:36 AM
This is one bad ass fisking of the original. Sweet and to the point.
 
.
permalink   sHORT fACED bEAR Mon, Jan 10, 2005 @ 4:42 PM
ok.. extended mix posted… thanks for all the feedback…
reworked the drums and added at bit more bass towards the end, gets a little darker..
 
.
permalink   fourstones Mon, Jan 10, 2005 @ 4:50 PM
This is beautiful sfb, I’m really glad you decided to pursue it. This goes directly into my Nomad Zen.
Shoes
.
permalink   Sun, Jan 2, 2005 @ 1:35 AM
Great work beaRface!

Quote: …Some (unsolicited) suggestions:

- Encode it at 128bps (instead of 320)


Ermmm. I really can’t understand why- surely the higher bitrate the better?

Oh and its ff and bass these days- ask [society]!
[society][i]
.
permalink   Sun, Jan 2, 2005 @ 11:35 PM
‘ff and bass’ is a registered trademark (r) by [society]
men must pay for it …groupie-girls can ‘work’ for it :D

@ the track:
two points have to be reflected - the first: i think the
track is really to short (the dnb tracks i know have an
intro that takes 1.33min) - the second point: the vocal-
use is very compressed for the dnb-style - in a track
that would take up to 7 min the vocals could be used
this way but in not even 2 min it’s too much… you know
what i mean? ;)
shockshadow
.
permalink   Sat, Jan 15, 2005 @ 9:55 PM
i like i like i LIKE! great job man….this rox. check out mine : )
Mike Linksvayer
.
permalink   Mon, Jan 17, 2005 @ 3:31 PM
my cat is meowing
creativelycommon
.
permalink   Sat, Jan 29, 2005 @ 4:43 PM
superb
cdk
.
permalink   Thu, Aug 18, 2005 @ 11:28 AM
my cat is meowing

you got that right… if you can hear me, just gimme the drums….