Reviews for "Christmas Memes"
debbizo |
.
permalink
Sun, Dec 2, 2012 @ 4:24 AM
I love this song!
|
.
|
|
Steven M Bryant |
.
permalink
Sun, Dec 2, 2012 @ 4:43 AM
This is awesome!
|
.
|
|
Speck |
.
permalink
Sun, Dec 2, 2012 @ 5:05 AM
Great song and a wonderful rendition. But - isn’t it copyrighted?
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
No, I did a bunch of research on this years ago. You can copy..as in perform original music based on existing work, but if you copy…as in literally copy…as in sample, even half a second of copyrighted material you have infringed. It basically comes down to not being able to copyright a melody. That’s how karaoke companies get away with it. You have to change the name too. Not saying its really fair or I agree with it. I hear music in commercials sometimes where it’s clear to me that someone got paid a little bit of money to ‘copy’ another song…just because they didn’t want to pay to use the original. They should just pay the money IMO.
|
|
.
“You can copy..as in perform original music based on existing work…”
“…not…able to copyright a melody” So covers are not copyright infringement? Like Coltrane’s version for example? He, or his record company, didn’t have to pay for that? That’s interesting. And a little confusing. And, if correct, it opens up a whole new slew of possibilities I didn’t realize were legit. Thanks for the info. |
|
.
I’m still no entertainment lawyer. And lawyers are good at finding loopholes. The one here is that Coltrain used the same title which acknowledges the use of copyrighted material. … the “intent” to infringe. I guess if he called it “Coltrain’s favorite things” they may not have had to pay… Even though that still shows intent to infringe, it isnt exact…even more confusing, right? But is it morally right… Is it just lame? The karaoke companies that use the same names DO have to pay royalties BTW, I was referring to some that don’t and they get away with it by changing the name. Patent and copyright law is tricky and annoying specially when it comes to software, genetics, biology, medicine, etc.
“Copyright protects only original works that are “fixed to a tangible medium.” |
|
.
Actually, it’s chord progressions and not melody that you can’t copyright. New “arrangements” do have the same melodies but different chord progressions so its not clear if it infringes or not. If someone copyrighted a simple melody and someone else copied it note for note that is a clear infringement. This stuff is definitely tricky. Jazz is even trickier because the melodies are changed during improvisation… so you recognize it but it isn’t exactly the same. There’s even software that will eventually be able to play something “like” Hendrix, or the Beatles. It’ll be interesting to see if they will try to litigate when that happens. Apple is working on a patent where you can send a text and listen to it in somebody’s voice. Stuff is getting weird …lol
|
|
.
“This stuff is definitely tricky. Jazz is even trickier”
Yeah I’m just downloading everything you’ve got here. I really like it. And you’ve got so much great improvisation going on I’m pretty sure one (me?) could remix it in such a way as to have very little or no similarity to the original. |
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
Snowflake |
.
permalink
Tue, Dec 4, 2012 @ 12:11 PM
clever lyrics. amazing music production!!!
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
TheDICE |
.
permalink
Tue, Dec 11, 2012 @ 7:53 AM
Beautiful music! A lot of entertaining and catchy melodies!! Congrats, Sir. I love this track
|
.
|
|
texasradiofish |
.
permalink
Sat, Dec 15, 2012 @ 4:57 AM
This is clearly one of my favorite jam songs … next folks will be jammin’ on Nature Boy.
Always a pleasure, J |
.
|